by Tim Fok | 23rd January 2017
Canon has announced a new service that allows owners to change their Canon C700 sensor from the Dual Pixel AF rolling shutter to a global shutter version via registered service centres. Canon Europe has made the announcement along with pricing info on lens mount swapping between EF and PL. It has been known since its original announcement that there would be two versions of the Canon C700 sensor, one with a rolling shutter and one with a global shutter. However, Canon Europe has now revealed they will offer this as an upgrade service – purchase the rolling shutter C700 sensor and you can switch out to global shutter at a later date. It’s not a straight like for like swap, though. Migrating to the global shutter version also converts the mount to PL if it wasn’t PL to start with, therefore losing Dual Pixel Auto Focus and reportedly a stop of dynamic range. As a result there are now 3 versions of the Canon C700 you can buy off the shelf: the C700, C700 PL and C700 GS PL. The news also brings pricing and info on how the lens mount swap service will work. Canon offers the lens mount change service through their network of Regional Competence Centres (RCC). Said centres can switch your EF mount to PL (with Cook/i support), revert back to EF for you, or even do the initial change and supply shims for you to do yourself in future. The latter is a warmly welcomed process. Changing between lens mounts on competing camera systems like ARRI is a two-minute process for the user, so it’s good to see this will be of a similar ilk on the C700. Pricing below (subject to VAT and inbound shipping): The lens mount swap service will be available from March 2017. Canon is less clear on the C700 sensor swap service, marked simply as “later in 2017”. No word on US servicing yet, but the announcement is surely to be imminent. via Canon EuropeRead more
by Richard Lackey | 30th April 2015
Let’s face it, slow motion is bad ass. You don’t get more bad ass than this amazing shot of a .500 S&W Magnum by Herra Kuulapaa (www.kuulapaa.com). While this may be an extreme example, and it’s a still, not a grab from motion, nothing gets the imagination going quite like the ability to shoot high frame rates. Give yourself the edge by understanding the fundamentals of global vs rolling shutter, shutter angles and exposures at high frame rates. A few weeks back I wrote an article “8 Essential Steps to Perfect Exposure – The Knowledge Any Cameraman Should Have”. If you haven’t read it yet, now would be a good time to do that, and then come back to read this one. 1. Mechanical Shutter In a film camera, the shutter is a mechanical rotating mirror. As it rotates 360 degrees per exposure it alternates covering and uncovering the film gate for a particular amount of time. The RPM of the shutter is mechanically fixed and determined by the frame rate, and the exposure time is determined by the shutter angle. During exposure the film is held perfectly still, often with registration pins. While the mirror shutter covers the film gate, the pins mechanically disengage and the pull down claw physically advances the film to the next unexposed frame. 2. Rolling Shutter Many electronic shutters in digital cinema cameras feature a rolling shutter, where data is read out line by line from the top of the sensor to the bottom before being reset ready for the next frame exposure. A rolling shutter can exhibit a noticeable skew of would-be vertical lines in the image if either the camera or subject is moving quickly across the frame. This can create unwanted motion artifacts warping the whole image if the sensor read-out is particularly slow and there is fast motion in the frame. Most rolling shutters are incredibly fast, minimizing potential problems. Red and Arri among many others employ rolling shutters, and the results can lend a more “cinematic” feel than a global shutter. Even extremely high frame rate cameras such as the Phantom digital cinema cameras from Vision Research employ rolling shutter, but with a readout-time of only 1 millisecond. In this chart you can compare rolling shutter readout-times of different camera models we tested in our lab: 3. Global Shutter A global shutter differs from a rolling shutter in that at the end of a full exposure, light is blocked entirely across the sensor all at once while data is then read and it is reset for the next exposure. A global shutter preserves the perfect vertical alignment of vertical lines or objects moving horizontally through the frame. However, the feel of motion can be noticeably different. Depending on how a global shutter is implemented, there can be a small cost in light (fill factor) and possibly dynamic range when compared to a rolling shutter. 4. Shutter Angle Shutter angle is a term that refers to the actual physical angle of the opening in a rotating mechanical shutter in degrees. The angle of the opening determines the duration of the exposure as the shutter rotates. Mechanical shutters for the most part are gone in digital cinema cameras, but often the terminology has stuck. Shutter angle is your control of motion blur. The longer the exposure, the more motion blur, the shorter the exposure, the sharper any moving objects will appear. It can be calculated easily to a fraction of a second exposure time. Exposure time (1/x sec) = Frame Rate x (360 / Shutter Angle) For example, at a frame rate of 24fps at 180 degree shutter (180 degrees is considered normal): 180 degrees: 24 x (360 / 180) = 1/48th second Here is a whole table calculated for 24fps for shutter angles up to 220 degrees: 15 degrees = 1/576 sec 20 degrees = 1/432 sec 40 degrees = 1/216 sec 60 degrees = 1/144 sec 80 degrees = 1/108 sec 100 degrees = 1/86 sec 120 degrees = 1/72 sec 140 degrees = 1/62 sec 160 degrees = 1/54 sec 180 degrees = 1/48 sec 200 degrees = 1/43 sec 220 degrees = 1/39 sec Any change in shutter angle changes the exposure time, and will need to be compensated for with a change in aperture to maintain correct exposure. Of course a change in aperture will affect depth of field. So if depth of field needs to remain unaffected also, the only thing left is to add ND filters (if reducing light to compensate for a longer exposure time) or increase the actual light levels illuminating the scene (if compensating for a shorter exposure time). If we consider 180 degrees as the base (normal) angle as “Full Exposure”, the following compensation table applies. Shutter Angle F-Stop/T-Stop Compensation 197-200 Close 1/4 166-196 Full Exposure 148-165 Open 1/4 135-147 Open 1/3 121-134 Open 1/2 111-120 Open 2/3 99-110 Open 3/4 83-98 Open 1 74-82 Open 1 1/4 68-73 Open 1 1/3 61-67 Open 1 1/2 56-60 Open 1 2/3 50-55 Open 1 3/4 42-49 Open 2 37-41 Open 2 1/4 34-36 Open 2 1/3 31-33 Open 2 1/2 28-30 Open 2 2/3 25-27 Open 2 3/4 22.5-24 Open 3 5. High Frame Rates In the age of digital cinema, more than ever before there is a demand for high frame rates in our cameras. This used to be a specialty requirement but is now expected. Capturing the spray of ocean waves in crisp frozen detail, liquids pouring or simply the beauty of smooth slow motion is no longer out of our reach. Many cinema cameras can now shoot at least 60fps if not much higher. Vision Research has been on top of extreme high speed cinematography for some time. While 1000 – 2000fps is still out of reach for most of us, cameras like the Phantom Flex 4K are pushing the limits of what can be achieved. Be aware of how high frame rates impact your exposure (and light requirements). For any camera, regardless of sensor, regardless of manufacturer the same rules are true when it comes to high frame rates and exposure. It’s purely mathematics. Every time you double the frame rate, you are halving the exposure time for each frame… and halving the amount of light hitting the sensor. For an example, lets assume a “normal” shutter angle of 180 degrees. At 24 frames per second, with a 180 degree shutter gives us an exposure time of 1/48th sec. If we double the frame rate to 48fps, with the same shutter angle we halve the exposure time to 1/96th sec. We’ve just lost a full stop of light and are only at 48fps. Let’s extrapolate this out and I’ll rather use 25fps as a starting point instead of 24fps because it will multiply out with round numbers: 25fps @ 180deg = 1/50th sec 50fps @ 180deg = 1/100th sec (1 stop loss) 100fps @ 180deg = 1/200th sec (2 stop loss) 200fps @ 180deg = 1/400th sec (3 stop loss) 400fps @ 180deg = 1/800th sec (4 stop loss) Of course frame rates can be anywhere in between these numbers but I’ve simply doubled it every time for the example. So you can see we’re losing a stop of light every time we double the frame rate. Losing a full stop is not a small amount of light. Every stop lost is a halving of light. 1 stop loss = 1/2 the light 2 stop loss = 1/4 the light 3 stop loss = 1/8 the light 4 stop loss = 1/16 the light Just as a change in shutter angle at a normal frame rate affects exposure time and requires a compensation to be made in lens aperture or lighting, high frame rates require even more compensation beyond just opening up the lens. This means if you have enough light for a correct exposure at 25fps and you don’t want to affect your depth of field (by opening up your aperture), you’ll have to double the amount of light used to light your scene or subject to get the same correct exposure at 50fps. You’ll have to quadruple the amount of light on your subject to have a correct exposure at 100fps. This just doubles every time, so to have a correctly exposed image at 200fps you need 8x the amount of light on your scene as you would at a normal 25fps frame rate. The sun gives us plenty of light for this, so outside under daylight, compensating for the much shorter exposure times when shooting high frame rates is much less of an issue. However, inside under artificial lighting… you have to crank up the light seriously (double it) every time you double the frame rate. It’s normal that high speed table top shoots for instance require a ton of light. If you are on set when shooting a product shot involving a liquid pouring and they have a Phantom on set shooting at 1000fps, they will have serious light on that product. 6. Base Sensitivity When it comes to high frame rates, a higher “native” base ISO or exposure index (EI) is always beneficial. Keep this in mind when comparing cameras. Every sensor is different and every camera will perform differently capturing high frame rates. If a particular camera gives brighter images at high frame rates, it’s either because the sensor has a higher base ISO or it can be pushed above its base ISO with acceptable noise. Base sensitivity of a sensor is down to many things, simplest of which is the size of the photosites (but that is a huge simplification), and this is determined by how many of them are crammed onto the sensor. If you increase resolution (or number of photosites) and keep sensor size the same, the photosites get smaller and as a generalization, base sensitivity will decrease. The amount of space between photosites is also a factor, and the amount of space needed for circuitry at each photosite. 7. Shot Noise In the end regardless of all this there is “shot noise”, a minimum level of “noise” when counting or detecting small numbers of photons that is due to variations in quantum probability. If you throw one single photon at a surface with 50% reflectance, there is a 50% probability that it will be reflected or absorbed. So that surface could show up if the photon is reflected and detected at a photosite, or it could be black if the photon is absorbed rather than reflected. The more photons that are thrown at the surface, eventually probability dictates that 50% will be reflected and 50% will be absorbed. If you flip a single coin, it will land either heads, or tails but there can only be one possible outcome and the probability is equal it could land either way. If you flip 1000 coins, you should on average count 50% heads and 50% tails. I don’t want to over-play “shot noise”, it’s only a factor at extremely low light levels, but I just want to point out that even if an image sensor is otherwise perfect (which none are), it does define a impenetrable minimum noise floor that is simply down to quantum physics. Other types of noise also come into play such as Fixed Pattern Noise (FPN) which is caused by non-uniformities of the sensor in the manufacturing process. FPN is fixed and can be mapped out, however other types of temporal noise are more difficult to reduce. 8. Light A image sensor will always perform best when there is plenty of light, and when you have very short exposure times for each frame (as in pushing higher frame rates) the only solution is more light. As I have explained before in “8 Essential Steps to Perfect Exposure – The Knowledge Any Cameraman Should Have” exposing your sensor properly is the single most important key to achieving the image you envision seeing beautifully graded and finished after post production.Read more
by Sebastian Wöber | 22nd November 2013
We’ve been testing the new mirrorless Sony alpha a7 and Sony alpha a7R cameras that come with very promising new features dedication to video. Here’s a quick and dirty resolution comparison of the video function between these two and our all time favourite the Canon 5D mark III. When you watch the video you can clearly see the differences between the cameras. Some initially thought the higher resolution of the a7R versus the a7 would increase the video quality. This is true, but the test reveals that this difference is ever so tiny that it can hardly be noticed. When compared to the 5D mark III on the other hand we can see that the aliasing and moiré of the a7 as well as the a7R is pretty severe, probably similar to that of Canon DSLR’s like the 7D or TxI line. On the left you can see the rig I used to make an accurate rolling shutter comparison. This revealed that the rolling shutter on the 5D mark III is much stronger than on the a7’s. Is this a good thing? Yes it is. But the rolling shutter seems to be something most people take less severe as an argument against a camera. The settings on both a7’s were the “Neutral” picture profile with everything turned down to -3. The same goes for the 5D mark III which had the “Neutral” picture profile and contrast/saturation/sharpness all the way down to 0. There was no grading applied except for the last shot. What I found really great about the Sony a7 was its oled viewfinder. This thing is truly amazing. I wish more cameras had this kind of technology implemented, or the A7’s had a cleaner image. In terms of functionality it’s not a bad camera by Sony. For more info check out Johnnie Behiri’s review. Song kindly provided by themusicbed Windmills – Creating Something BeautifulRead more
We only send updates about our most relevant articles. No spam, guaranteed! And if you don't like our newsletter, you can unsubscribe with a single click. Read our full opt-out policy here.