8 Essential Steps to Understanding Global vs Rolling Shutter and High Frame Rates

kuulapaa 500 sw

Let’s face it, slow motion is bad ass. You don’t get more bad ass than this amazing shot of a .500 S&W Magnum by Herra Kuulapaa (www.kuulapaa.com). While this may be an extreme example, and it’s a still, not a grab from motion, nothing gets the imagination going quite like the ability to shoot high frame rates.

Give yourself the edge by understanding the fundamentals of global vs rolling shutter, shutter angles and exposures at high frame rates.

A few weeks back I wrote an article 8 Essential Steps to Perfect Exposure – The Knowledge Any Cameraman Should Have. If you haven’t read it yet, now would be a good time to do that, and then come back to read this one.

1. Mechanical Shutter

Moviecam_schematic_animationIn a film camera, the shutter is a mechanical rotating mirror. As it rotates 360 degrees per exposure it alternates covering and uncovering the film gate for a particular amount of time. The RPM of the shutter is mechanically fixed and determined by the frame rate, and the exposure time is determined by the shutter angle.

During exposure the film is held perfectly still, often with registration pins. While the mirror shutter covers the film gate, the pins mechanically disengage and the pull down claw physically advances the film to the next unexposed frame.

2. Rolling Shutter

Many electronic shutters in digital cinema cameras feature a rolling shutter, where data is read out line by line from the top of the sensor to the bottom before being reset ready for the next frame exposure.

A rolling shutter can exhibit a noticeable skew of would-be vertical lines in the image if either the camera or subject is moving quickly across the frame. This can create unwanted motion artifacts warping the whole image if the sensor read-out is particularly slow and there is fast motion in the frame. Most rolling shutters are incredibly fast, minimizing potential problems. Red and Arri among many others employ rolling shutters, and the results can lend a more “cinematic” feel than a global shutter.

Even extremely high frame rate cameras such as the Phantom digital cinema cameras from Vision Research employ rolling shutter, but with a readout-time of only 1 millisecond.

In this chart you can compare rolling shutter readout-times of different camera models we tested in our lab:


3. Global Shutter

A global shutter differs from a rolling shutter in that at the end of a full exposure, light is blocked entirely across the sensor all at once while data is then read and it is reset for the next exposure.

A global shutter preserves the perfect vertical alignment of vertical lines or objects moving horizontally through the frame. However, the feel of motion can be noticeably different.

Depending on how a global shutter is implemented, there can be a small cost in light (fill factor) and possibly dynamic range when compared to a rolling shutter.

4. Shutter Angle

shuttersShutter angle is a term that refers to the actual physical angle of the opening in a rotating mechanical shutter in degrees. The angle of the opening determines the duration of the exposure as the shutter rotates.

Mechanical shutters for the most part are gone in digital cinema cameras, but often the terminology has stuck.

Shutter angle is your control of motion blur. The longer the exposure, the more motion blur, the shorter the exposure, the sharper any moving objects will appear.

It can be calculated easily to a fraction of a second exposure time.

Exposure time (1/x sec) = Frame Rate x (360 / Shutter Angle)

For example, at a frame rate of 24fps at 180 degree shutter (180 degrees is considered normal):

180 degrees: 24 x (360 / 180) = 1/48th second

Here is a whole table calculated for 24fps for shutter angles up to 220 degrees:

15 degrees = 1/576 sec
20 degrees = 1/432 sec
40 degrees = 1/216 sec
60 degrees = 1/144 sec
80 degrees = 1/108 sec
100 degrees = 1/86 sec
120 degrees = 1/72 sec
140 degrees = 1/62 sec
160 degrees = 1/54 sec
180 degrees = 1/48 sec
200 degrees = 1/43 sec
220 degrees = 1/39 sec

Any change in shutter angle changes the exposure time, and will need to be compensated for with a change in aperture to maintain correct exposure. Of course a change in aperture will affect depth of field. So if depth of field needs to remain unaffected also, the only thing left is to add ND filters (if reducing light to compensate for a longer exposure time) or increase the actual light levels illuminating the scene (if compensating for a shorter exposure time).

If we consider 180 degrees as the base (normal) angle as “Full Exposure”, the following compensation table applies.

Shutter Angle            F-Stop/T-Stop Compensation

197-200                     Close 1/4
166-196                     Full Exposure
148-165                     Open 1/4
135-147                     Open 1/3
121-134                     Open 1/2
111-120                     Open 2/3
99-110                       Open 3/4
83-98                         Open 1
74-82                         Open 1 1/4
68-73                         Open 1 1/3
61-67                         Open 1 1/2
56-60                         Open 1 2/3
50-55                         Open 1 3/4
42-49                         Open 2
37-41                         Open 2 1/4
34-36                         Open 2 1/3
31-33                         Open 2 1/2
28-30                         Open 2 2/3
25-27                         Open 2 3/4
22.5-24                      Open 3

5. High Frame Rates


highspeed sea froth
In the age of digital cinema, more than ever before there is a demand for high frame rates in our cameras. This used to be a specialty requirement but is now expected.

Capturing the spray of ocean waves in crisp frozen detail, liquids pouring or simply the beauty of smooth slow motion is no longer out of our reach. Many cinema cameras can now shoot at least 60fps if not much higher.

Vision Research has been on top of extreme high speed cinematography for some time. While 1000 – 2000fps is still out of reach for most of us, cameras like the Phantom Flex 4K are pushing the limits of what can be achieved.

Be aware of how high frame rates impact your exposure (and light requirements).

Alexa Menu HSFor any camera, regardless of sensor, regardless of manufacturer the same rules are true when it comes to high frame rates and exposure. It’s purely mathematics.

Every time you double the frame rate, you are halving the exposure time for each frame… and halving the amount of light hitting the sensor.

For an example, lets assume a “normal” shutter angle of 180 degrees.

At 24 frames per second, with a 180 degree shutter gives us an exposure time of 1/48th sec.

If we double the frame rate to 48fps, with the same shutter angle we halve the exposure time to 1/96th sec. We’ve just lost a full stop of light and are only at 48fps.

Let’s extrapolate this out and I’ll rather use 25fps as a starting point instead of 24fps because it will multiply out with round numbers:

25fps @ 180deg = 1/50th sec
50fps @ 180deg = 1/100th sec (1 stop loss)
100fps @ 180deg = 1/200th sec (2 stop loss)
200fps @ 180deg = 1/400th sec (3 stop loss)
400fps @ 180deg = 1/800th sec (4 stop loss)

Of course frame rates can be anywhere in between these numbers but I’ve simply doubled it every time for the example.

So you can see we’re losing a stop of light every time we double the frame rate.

Losing a full stop is not a small amount of light. Every stop lost is a halving of light.

1 stop loss = 1/2 the light
2 stop loss = 1/4 the light
3 stop loss = 1/8 the light
4 stop loss = 1/16 the light

Just as a change in shutter angle at a normal frame rate affects exposure time and requires a compensation to be made in lens aperture or lighting, high frame rates require even more compensation beyond just opening up the lens.

This means if you have enough light for a correct exposure at 25fps and you don’t want to affect your depth of field (by opening up your aperture), you’ll have to double the amount of light used to light your scene or subject to get the same correct exposure at 50fps.

You’ll have to quadruple the amount of light on your subject to have a correct exposure at 100fps. This just doubles every time, so to have a correctly exposed image at 200fps you need 8x the amount of light on your scene as you would at a normal 25fps frame rate.

The sun gives us plenty of light for this, so outside under daylight, compensating for the much shorter exposure times when shooting high frame rates is much less of an issue.

However, inside under artificial lighting… you have to crank up the light seriously (double it) every time you double the frame rate.

It’s normal that high speed table top shoots for instance require a ton of light. If you are on set when shooting a product shot involving a liquid pouring and they have a Phantom on set shooting at 1000fps, they will have serious light on that product.

6. Base Sensitivity

When it comes to high frame rates, a higher “native” base ISO or exposure index (EI) is always beneficial. Keep this in mind when comparing cameras. Every sensor is different and every camera will perform differently capturing high frame rates.

If a particular camera gives brighter images at high frame rates, it’s either because the sensor has a higher base ISO or it can be pushed above its base ISO with acceptable noise.

Base sensitivity of a sensor is down to many things, simplest of which is the size of the photosites (but that is a huge simplification), and this is determined by how many of them are crammed onto the sensor. If you increase resolution (or number of photosites) and keep sensor size the same, the photosites get smaller and as a generalization, base sensitivity will decrease.

The amount of space between photosites is also a factor, and the amount of space needed for circuitry at each photosite.

7. Shot Noise

In the end regardless of all this there is “shot noise”, a minimum level of “noise” when counting or detecting small numbers of photons that is due to variations in quantum probability. If you throw one single photon at a surface with 50% reflectance, there is a 50% probability that it will be reflected or absorbed. So that surface could show up if the photon is reflected and detected at a photosite, or it could be black if the photon is absorbed rather than reflected.

The more photons that are thrown at the surface, eventually probability dictates that 50% will be reflected and 50% will be absorbed. If you flip a single coin, it will land either heads, or tails but there can only be one possible outcome and the probability is equal it could land either way. If you flip 1000 coins, you should on average count 50% heads and 50% tails.

I don’t want to over-play “shot noise”, it’s only a factor at extremely low light levels, but I just want to point out that even if an image sensor is otherwise perfect (which none are), it does define a impenetrable minimum noise floor that is simply down to quantum physics. Other types of noise also come into play such as Fixed Pattern Noise (FPN) which is caused by non-uniformities of the sensor in the manufacturing process. FPN is fixed and can be mapped out, however other types of temporal noise are more difficult to reduce.

8. Light

A image sensor will always perform best when there is plenty of light, and when you have very short exposure times for each frame (as in pushing higher frame rates) the only solution is more light.

As I have explained before in 8 Essential Steps to Perfect Exposure – The Knowledge Any Cameraman Should Have exposing your sensor properly is the single most important key to achieving the image you envision seeing beautifully graded and finished after post production.

Leave a Comment

You are not subscribed to this post. Follow new comments

Login to comment

Chris Lombardo Reply
Chris Lombardo April 30, 2015

Assuming a rolling shutter, can you please address the impact of higher shutter speeds available on most DVSLRs? I understand the relationship between shutter speed & shutter angle in your charts above, but what are the pros/cons of using extremely high shutter speeds of 1/1000 – 1/6000, besides just the effect on motion blur and of course exposure?

James May 1, 2015

A rotating mechanical shutter can be analogous to both a rolling or a global digital shutter, depending of the shutter angle. However in most cases it performs a lot more like a global shutter, not a rolling shutter.

At common angles like 180°, while it may appear at first glance to behave like a rolling shutter because the shutter sweeps across the film, the exposure is more global as the whole frame is exposed to light during the majority of the exposure. The brief beginning and end of the sweep has an imperceptible effect on the motion blur and won’t cause the image to jello like a digital rolling shutter.

Again… They are very different. At 180° the majority of the film is exposed simultaneously. With a digital rollong shutter each row is read off in turn. In film photons keep hitting ‘the top row’. In digital once it’s read off, it moves to the next line.

The only time a mechanical shutter starts to behave like a digital rolling shutter is at extremely rare, very acute shutter angles like 1° where only a slit sweeps across the image. But even then it’s a much wider exposure strip than a rolling shutter. Remember the skew from digital rolling shutter is per-line scanning. To get that on a piece of film with a rough 1080P analogue would mean a shutter angle of 180/1080. I don’t know if there are any film cameras designed to do such extreme shutter angles.

Richard Lackey Reply
Richard Lackey May 1, 2015

Hi James, I guess in this case the explanation I have given is a victim of over simplification but I wanted people to understand the general concept of an image read-out top to bottom vs stopping exposure globally before sensor read-out. It is in reality more complicated than this.

I think one of the main factors to understand with a rolling shutter really is read-out time. With a very fast read-out and initiation time (such as Alexa’s 6ms for instance) the initiation and termination phases are so quick that by far the majority of the time during exposure the whole frame is either fully exposed or not yet initiated (would be physically obstructed if a mechanical shutter). This is more analogous to a mechanical film shutter, but technically it is still a rolling shutter.

If initiation and termination phases are far slower, this begins to occupy a much larger portion of each exposure, and in some very slow cases can even happen simultaneously, resulting in a initiation and read-out stripe sweeping across the sensor. This is where we see the worse jello effects.

You are right that with a rolling shutter the sensor’s photosites are always exposed to photons, whereas a frame of film is physically obstructed but just as there is a read-out phase, there is also a reset and initiation phase, and the time between those two phases (the time a mechanical shutter would be physically blocking exposure) the exposure to light happening is being ignored and won’t ever be read-out as the sensor is in between frames, in betweens states, it is an inactive period after read-out but before reset. At 180 degrees for instance, this period is as long as the active exposure period.

James Barber May 5, 2015

Arri itself knows that their 6ms rolling shutter isn’t fast enough for some instances. That’s why they make the Alexa Studio with a mirror shutter in front of the regular Alexa sensor. The sensor reads out and resets in complete darkness, which eliminates the problem of the bottom reading out time-delayed information with respect to the top of the image.

6ms rolling shutter is significantly better than some cameras, but will still show significant artefacts with flashing lights and jerky movement. You’re right in that the jellocam effect is very reduced but not eliminated which is very apparent if you ever try to stabilise jiggly hand-held Alexa stuff.

Alexa Studio doesn’t have these artefacts because of the mechanical shutter. Neither does film, or global shutter sensors. RED offer an electro-optical shutter mount similar to what Tessive used to sell (maybe they bought the tech). It also allows the RED to readout and reset while in relative darkness, also reducing rolling shutter artifacts.

Everyone making these high-end cameras (Arri, RED, Sony) knows people prefer no rolling shutter, so they offer high-priced alternatives that the majority of the market considers to be not worth the extra spend.

There might come a time like pre-2005ish when all sensors were global. Rolling shutter CMOS was a really clever way to trade off weird artefacts for increased sensitivity.

When the first expensive cameras came out with it there was a HUGE reaction from the industry complaining about camera flashes or police car lights only lighting half the frame. Film doesn’t do that… unless you have an INCREDIBLY tiny shutter angle.

Richard Lackey Reply
Richard Lackey May 5, 2015

Hi James, awesome additional info! And great to see someone that gets it! Yes! Thanks for adding that. Yes, the Alexa Studio is a great cross-breed, I just figured if I mentioned it, it might make people confused. You are spot on though with everything you mentioned.

William Malone Reply
William Malone May 1, 2015

Excellent article on this. i do want to point out that film cinema camera shutters are actually a bit of both rolling shutter and global shutters as there is a moment when the entire film plane is exposed unlike either other versions. An example of a film rolling shutter would be an old Speed Graphic with a Focal Plane Shutter which has a traveling slit.

Richard Lackey Reply
Richard Lackey May 1, 2015

Hi William,

Thank you!

As I tried to explain to James in his similar comment (he brought up almost exactly the same thing) there seems to be a misunderstanding as to how electronic shutters function. This was the point of the article but maybe I needed to take it further.

I will explain the sequence of events below.

In all cases (mechanical film, electronic rolling and electronic global) the entire frame is actively exposed to light for the required period (let’s say 1/48th second for 24fps @ 180 degrees). For the vast majority of this 1/48th sec period, the whole frame is exposed regardless of shutter type. It’s not just a “moment” that the entire film plane is exposed, it’s the majority of the exposed period.

The “rolling” shutter is simply the line by line sequential readout at the end of the 1/48th sec exposure period (keeping this 24fps @ 180 degree example), and this happens incredibly quickly… only 6ms in the example of Arri Alexa. Then the sensor is not active for another 1/48th sec at which point it is reset and initiated for the next frame (again only taking 6ms for the Alexa example) and this is also line by line.

Every line gets exactly the same exposure period, only not at exactly the same start and stop time, that’s the rolling in the rolling shutter. However, for most of the exposure, the entire sensor is exposed at the same time. A line by line sequential sweep taking only 6ms for the entire sensor is almost totally unnoticeable.

Slower read-out times are noticeable, and produce the jelly effect we see on slower shutter sensors.

An electronic rolling shutter with a fast read-out time is very similar to a mechanical rotating film shutter in it’s sequence and end result.

A global shutter is essentially the same, only it has a means to block light across the entire sensor at once after the exposure period (lets keep our 1/48th sec example) before the line by line read-out (in the same way as rolling shutter, only this takes place in the dark preventing any further exposure taking place during read-out), and keeps the sensor in the dark until after reset. Once the sensor is reset, it’s exposed to light again, the entire frame all at once.