FUJIFILM X-T2 vs X-H1 – 120fps Slow-Motion Comparison

UPDATE, May 17th: FUJIFILM has pulled down their newly released 4.0 firmware due to malfunction. None of the discovered problems are video related. For more information head to the full press release here: http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n180517.html

The latest FUJIFILM X-T2 firmware update brought a few new great features for this ageing camera – one of them is the ability to record 120 frames per second in full HD quality. 

Firmware 4.00 for X-T2

Firmware Ver 4.00 for FUJIFILM X-T2 featuring internal F-log recording (watch my video testing that here), 120fps in full HD quality and better autofocus (just to name a few), is now available for a free download. We can only salute FUJIFILM for bringing such a major update for what used to be  their flagship camera until recently – their current top model, the X-H1, could very well be cannibalised by this free upgrade.

One feature that both cameras now share is high frame rate recording. Based on frequent requests we had since the introduction of this update, I went out to check how close (or not) the two cameras perform under similar (or identical) conditions and settings.

Similar Battery Life, Almost identical AF, Slightly Different F-log

As a “side dish”, this short comparison between the two cameras also revealed that their battery life is very similar and their autofocus capabilities are almost identical with a slight upper hand to the X-T2. (This firmware update REALLY upgraded the X-T2 AF effectiveness. Hopefully the same will be said when and if the X-H1 gets the same treatment). On the other hand, I was surprised to see that the internal F-log recording characteristics is a bit different between the two camera, (The FUJIFILM X-H1 tends to be warmer), so assuming one will be using both on the same project, take into consideration that it might result in a bit more time consuming color grading.

Ungraded image from the timeline. Note the wormer tint of the X-H1

High Frame Rates Comparison between X-T2 and X-H1

Now, with so much pre-text, I can already see some of you raising concerns if I actually forgot the reason to why we are actually here…..Well, back to the high frame recording quality comparison between the FUJIFILM X-T2 and X-H1. Let me start with the end result. Although the sensor and processor behind both cameras are identical and the recording data rate is the same, the FUJIFlIM X-H1 produces the cleaner image between the two when shooting slow-motion. True, the image is far from being free from artifacts, but on close inspection, the X-H1 is simply better.

Both cameras were tuned for having similar settings but shutter speed. Explanation, below

I’ll leave you with some casual images that I took as it worth more then a thousands words….

Both cameras were set to F-log, had the same lens, variable ND filter, aperture, WB settings. similar shutter speed (The X-T2 will not do 24o but rather 250 shutter). Edited in Adobe Premiere latest edition and graded with FilmConvert (X-T2 F-log preset).

Music supplied by Art-List: Sound track for the above video, Everybody Get Up by Gran Torino

120 fps is BETTER in the X-H1 then the X-T2

What do you think about the high frame rate quality that the FUJIFILM cameras can produce? Is this sufficient for your professional work? Let us know in the comments section below!

Please Login to comment
avatar
3 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Johnnie BehiriFUJIFILM X-T2 vs X-H1 Slow Motion Quality Comparison by CVP! - Hi Speed CamerasHenry BergAttila Bakos Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Attila Bakos
Member
Attila Bakos

When I import that F-Log comparison image in Resolve, I can see that the X-T2 is slightly flatter, the shadows are more elevated, while the highlights peak around the same level. Can you see this in other source files as well?

 Henry Berg
Member
Henry Berg

Great comparison! I wonder if the differences in tone/cast might be due to the Vari NDs used, which are not NDs but a pair of Polas snapped together. Maybe using a proper MB with high-end NDs of the same brand would have eliminated the suspicion at least. On the other hand, the image looks really nice and very organic/cinematic, again setting Fuji ahead of the competitors IMO in the sub $10k mark. The combo XH1+XT2, at their current prices makes it a killer setup for A/B cam for all sorts of projects, specially narrative and advertising, considering that Fuji lenses… Read more »

trackback

[…] The camera site CVP has done a full comparison review here which pits the X-H1 against the X-T2 to see which camera strengths are ahead on each body and if it makes sense for X-T2 owners who are invested in a FUJI lens system to upgrade.  Their findings are interesting and as far as slow motion it is clear that while they use most of the same imaging pipeline; the X-H1 has the edge with less crop, less aliasing, and better artifact suppression when using the 120fps slow motion mode. […]

GET 6 MUSIC LICENSES FREE!
Subscribe to the cinema5D + Music Vine newsletters
& get 6 tracks and licenses for commercial online projects* from musicvine.com.
Your e-mail will be stored with cinema5D and Music Vine. You can unsubscribe from our newsletters at any time.
We will not share your information with a third party.
The licenses included in this promotion will provide Web coverage for
Music Vine´s Promotional, Branded, Advert license with a project budget up to $15k.
MV-logo
c5d-logo
PLEASE CHECK YOUR INBOX
AND CONFIRM YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS
I agree to my personal data being stored and used to receive newsletter from cinema5d.com and musicvine.com